Retina Gallery ~ Full Sized Retina Images

Library of Free, Non-Copyrighted Retina Images and Videos

Choose your language:



63-year-old man was seen in the office on May 10, 2012. He has been diabetic for twenty two years. He did have a stroke in September. He lost his right peripheral vision. His central vision is fine. VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25. IOP: OD 11, OS 14. SLIT EXAMINATION: There is 2+ nuclear sclerosis in both eyes. EXTENDED OPHTHALMOSCOPY: OD: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.6. There is no posterior vitreous separation. There is exudate and microaneurysms clustered particularly inferior to the fovea. OS: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.6. There is no posterior vitreous separation. There is exudate and microaneurysms clustered superior to the fovea. In both eyes there does appear to be edema within 500 microns of the center of the fovea. SPECTRALIS-SD-OCT SCAN: The OCT scan in the right eye shows an average central foveal thickness of 270 microns, which is normal. The left eye shows an average central foveal thickness of 258 microns, which is normal. Both eyes though do have edema within less than a disc-diameter in the center. FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: Fluorescein angiography shows microaneurysms leaking inferior to the fovea in the right eye and superior to the fovea in the left eye. FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHY - INFRA RED: The infra red and auto fluorescence images show a cluster of microaneurysms inferior to the fovea with some hemorrhage in that area. The infra red and auto fluorescence images in the left eye show microaneurysms clustered superior to the fovea with some hemorrhage in that area. IMPRESSION: 1. BACKGROUND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY – BOTH EYES 2. CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT MACULAR EDEMA – BOTH EYES DISCUSSION: I explained to the patient he does have diabetic macular edema in both eyes. The ETDRS study shows that laser treatment is beneficial in this situation, however, the sub group analysis show that people with good vision there didn’t seem to be any difference between treated and non treated patients in two years. Therefore I think it is reasonable with today’s technology, to follow him closely and treat him should the edema worsen and not treat him should the edema stabilize or improve. To that I asked him to return for a check in three to four months or sooner should he notice a problem.

csmegoodvaod_ando01.png
850 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando02.png
638 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando03.png
585 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando04.jpg
601 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando05.jpg
609 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando06.jpg
527 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando07.jpg
436 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando08.jpg
457 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando09.jpg
459 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando10.jpg
478 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaod_ando11.jpg
452 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando12.png
534 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando13.png
511 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando14.png
483 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando15.jpg
731 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando16.jpg
548 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando17.jpg
510 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando18.jpg
516 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando19.jpg
503 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando20.jpg
473 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando21.jpg
511 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando22.jpg
466 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando23.jpg
448 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando24.jpg
456 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
csmegoodvaos_ando25.jpg
627 views63-year-old man diabetic for twenty two years. His central vision is fine.

VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25
00000
(0 votes)
dmegoodva_3month_ando01.jpg
Diabetic Edema Better - 3 Months Follow-UP - No treatment - SD OCT606 viewsPatient remains asymptomatic and OCT shows less edema00000
(0 votes)
dmegoodva_3month_ando02.jpg
Diabetic Edema Better - 3 Months Follow-UP - No treatment - SD OCT727 viewsPatient remains asymptomatic and OCT shows less edema00000
(0 votes)
 
27 files on 1 page(s)

63-year-old man was seen in the office on May 10, 2012. He has been diabetic for twenty two years. He did have a stroke in September. He lost his right peripheral vision. His central vision is fine. VISUAL ACUITY: OD 20/25, OS 20/25. IOP: OD 11, OS 14. SLIT EXAMINATION: There is 2+ nuclear sclerosis in both eyes. EXTENDED OPHTHALMOSCOPY: OD: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.6. There is no posterior vitreous separation. There is exudate and microaneurysms clustered particularly inferior to the fovea. OS: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.6. There is no posterior vitreous separation. There is exudate and microaneurysms clustered superior to the fovea. In both eyes there does appear to be edema within 500 microns of the center of the fovea. SPECTRALIS-SD-OCT SCAN: The OCT scan in the right eye shows an average central foveal thickness of 270 microns, which is normal. The left eye shows an average central foveal thickness of 258 microns, which is normal. Both eyes though do have edema within less than a disc-diameter in the center. FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: Fluorescein angiography shows microaneurysms leaking inferior to the fovea in the right eye and superior to the fovea in the left eye. FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHY - INFRA RED: The infra red and auto fluorescence images show a cluster of microaneurysms inferior to the fovea with some hemorrhage in that area. The infra red and auto fluorescence images in the left eye show microaneurysms clustered superior to the fovea with some hemorrhage in that area. IMPRESSION: 1. BACKGROUND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY – BOTH EYES 2. CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT MACULAR EDEMA – BOTH EYES DISCUSSION: I explained to the patient he does have diabetic macular edema in both eyes. The ETDRS study shows that laser treatment is beneficial in this situation, however, the sub group analysis show that people with good vision there didn’t seem to be any difference between treated and non treated patients in two years. Therefore I think it is reasonable with today’s technology, to follow him closely and treat him should the edema worsen and not treat him should the edema stabilize or improve. To that I asked him to return for a check in three to four months or sooner should he notice a problem.