3/13/17 77 year old man presented with blurred vision for a week 20/40 and stage II MH. He was observed for 2 months and the hole did not resolve. He had PPV 5/31/17 (No ILM peel). Vision improved to 20/25 within 6 months of surgery
Stage II Macular Hole - PPV without ILM peelvaatamisi: 42477 year old man with 20/40 VA on presentation. Macular hole did not abort and vision dropped to 20/63. Post PPV vision was 20/25 within 6 months (0 hinnangut)
Stage II Macular Hole - PPV without ILM peelvaatamisi: 45677 year old man with 20/40 VA on presentation. Macular hole did not abort and vision dropped to 20/63. Post PPV vision was 20/25 within 6 months (0 hinnangut)
Stage II Macular Hole - PPV without ILM peelvaatamisi: 40277 year old man with 20/40 VA on presentation. Macular hole did not abort and vision dropped to 20/63. Post PPV vision was 20/25 within 6 months (0 hinnangut)
Stage II Macular Hole - PPV without ILM peelvaatamisi: 35377 year old man with 20/40 VA on presentation. Macular hole did not abort and vision dropped to 20/63. Post PPV vision was 20/25 within 6 months (0 hinnangut)
Stage II Macular Hole - PPV without ILM peelvaatamisi: 36477 year old man with 20/40 VA on presentation. Macular hole did not abort and vision dropped to 20/63. Post PPV vision was 20/25 within 6 months (0 hinnangut)
Stage II Macular Hole - PPV without ILM peelvaatamisi: 35877 year old man with 20/40 VA on presentation. Macular hole did not abort and vision dropped to 20/63. Post PPV vision was 20/25 within 6 months (0 hinnangut)
6 faili 1 lehel
3/13/17 77 year old man presented with blurred vision for a week 20/40 and stage II MH. He was observed for 2 months and the hole did not resolve. He had PPV 5/31/17 (No ILM peel). Vision improved to 20/25 within 6 months of surgery